• Home
  • About
  • International Relations
    • Journal Articles
    • Books
  • Journalism
    • Karya Jurnalistik
  • Commentary
  • Lecture
    • Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia
    • Pengantar Hubungan Internasional
    • Bahasa Inggris Diplomasi

Jurnal Asep Setiawan

Jurnal Asep Setiawan

Tag Archives: United States

Book: Diplomatic Theory of International Relations

04 Tuesday May 2010

Posted by Setiawan in Archives, Global Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Diplomacy, International relations, Paul Sharp, Political Science, Social Sciences, Theory, United States, Washington DC

Diplomacy does not take place simply between states but wherever people live in different groups. Paul Sharp argues that the demand for diplomacy, and the need for the insights of diplomatic theory, are on the rise. In contrast to conventional texts which use international relations theories to make sense of what diplomacy and diplomats do, this book explores what diplomacy and diplomats can contribute to the big theoretical and practical debates in international relations today. Sharp identifies a diplomatic tradition of international thought premised on the way people live in groups, the differences between intra- and inter-group relations, and the perspectives which those who handle inter-group relations develop about the sorts of international disputes which occur. He argues that the lessons of diplomacy are that we should be reluctant to judge, ready to appease, and alert to the partial grounds on which most universal claims about human beings are made.• Represents a new departure in the study of diplomacy and international relations, showing how mainstream IR approaches consistently misunderstand diplomacy and diplomats and underestimate their increasing importance • Examines critical issues of contemporary importance including rogue states, religious extremists, greedy corporations and public diplomacy from a novel perspective and suggests changes in how policy is conducted towards them • Employs both theoretical and practical examples from beyond the world of state diplomacy, and considers the international relations of the ancient world, the pre-Columbian Americas, medieval Europe, and encounters between Europeans and native peoples in Hawaii and North America

Contents

Introduction; Part I. Traditions of International Thought and the Disappointment of Diplomacy: 1. Diplomacy and diplomats in the radical tradition; 2. Diplomacy and diplomats in the rational tradition; 3. Diplomacy and diplomats in the realist tradition; Part II. Elements of a Diplomatic Tradition of International Thought: 4. The diplomatic tradition: conditions and relations of separateness; 5. The diplomatic tradition: diplomacy, diplomats and international relations; Part III. Diplomatic Understanding and International Societies: 6. Using the international society idea; 7. Integration-disintegration; 8. Expansion-contraction; 9. Concentration-diffusion; Part IV. Thinking Diplomatically about International Issues: 10. Rogue state diplomacy; 11. Greedy company diplomacy; 12. Crazy religion diplomacy; 13. Dumb public diplomacy; Conclusion.

Paul Sharp

University of Minnesota, Duluth

Source: Cambridge

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Book Review:Indonesia's transformation and the stability of Southeast Asia

17 Wednesday Mar 2010

Posted by Setiawan in Archives, Global Politics, politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Asia, East Timor, indonesia, Southeast Asia, Suharto, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, United States

Indonesia, the world’s fourth most populous country, is undergoing a profound transformation that could lead to a variety of outcomes, from the consolidation of democracy to return to authoritarianism or military rule, to radical Islamic rule, or to violent disintegration.The stakes are high, for Indonesia is the key to Southeast Asian security. The authors examine the trends and dynamics that are driving Indonesia’s transformation, outline possible strategic futures and their implications for regional stability, and identify options the United States might pursue in the critical challenge of influencing Indonesia’s future course.Steps the United States might take now include support for Indonesia’s stability and territorial integrity, reestablishment of Indonesian-U.S. military cooperation and interaction, aid in rebuilding a constructive Indonesian role in regional security, and support for development of a regional crisis reaction force. A continued strong U.S. presence in the Asia-Pacific region will reinforce the U.S. role as regional balancer.Other review:From http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PBZ/is_4_83/ai_109268892/Indonesia’s Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia is a report the RAND Corporation prepared for the U.S. Air Force to assess the rapid changes occurring in Indonesia and to recommend policies to the U.S. Government and the Air Force in response. The book is an excellent introduction to the complex situation that followed the end of the Suharto regime. Although its depth of coverage is rather limited by its length, it includes numerous footnotes and an extensive bibliography, which covers five pages and includes numerous academic papers, periodical articles, and reports from international conferences. Sources come not only from the Western world but also from Indonesia itself. This breadth of coverage improves the quality of Angel Rabasa’s and Peter Chalk’s summary and provides a valuable source for anyone seeking to further investigate the subject.The report begins with a succinct summary of the situation in Indonesia through 2001 and includes the growing pains of the post-Suharto political system; the conflict and United Nations intervention in East Timor; and the separatist pressures in several provinces. This summary also provides several recommendations that focus on improving the country’s stability and regional influence and U.S. Air Force policies toward Indonesia. The summary concludes with a caveat recommending that the Air Force continue to prepare for the worst-case scenario of complete Indonesian collapse. The remainder of the report elaborates on the points that the initial summary contains.The publication also includes chapters detailing Indonesia’s regional significance; its recent and future challenges; and opportunities for U.S. influence. Each chapter effectively presents its subject matter and is well documented, allowing the report to serve as a useful introductory publication to the region and a guide to further research.The only real criticism one might level against the report is its tone. In an attempt to achieve currency and relevance in 2001, Rabasa and Chalk chose to write in a journalistic style, which makes the piece read much like a long article in a current periodical. While this approach might have been effective in 2001, today it reads like old news. Despite this shortcoming, the authors effectively summarize a complex situation in a relatively short space. Therefore this report remains of value to the military professional as an introduction to the region and as a comprehensive bibliography.LCDR Kyle B. Beckman, USN, Fort Leavenworth, KansasSource: Google booksRead More

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Indonesia yang kuat dan bersatu

17 Wednesday Mar 2010

Posted by Setiawan in Archives, Global Politics, politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Asia, Government, History, indonesia, United States

The Coat of Arms of Indonesia is called Garuda...
Image via Wikipedia

Cita-cita pendiri negeri ini adalah Indonesia yang kuat, sejahtera, makmur dan damai. Sebuah cita-cita universal setiap negeri yang ada di muka bumi. Dalam perjalanannya lebih dari setengah abad ternyata banyak yang berubah, banyak kendala dan banyak tantangan.Semuanya tidak seindah apa yang tertulis.Dengan insiden tindak terorisme yang merupakan imbas dari globalisasi dan demokrasi. Globalisasi semakin mendekatkan Indonesia dengan negara-negara di luar termasuk Timur Tengah. Kekerasan di Palestina, Irak dan Afghanistan terasakan sampai di Indonesia.Globalisasi informasi ini menyebabkan pengaruh luar negeri semakin dekat dengan pelosok tanah air. Seolah-olah tidak ada satu inci wilayahpun di Indonesia tak tertembus aliran informasi dunia.Oleh karena itu agar Indonesia memiliki soliditas yang tinggi, tidak hanya ideologi yang harus kuat tetapi juga sumber daya manusia di tataran penyelenggara neger, para tokoh dan masyarakat itu sendiri.Kelemahan di jajaran petinggi negara -misalnya karena korup – akan memperlemah jalannya pemerintahan.Kualitas sumber daya manusia inilah yang seharusnya menjadi fokus dalam pembangunan Indonesia kini dan mendatang. Manusia yang jujur, berwawasan dan melihat ke depan akan menjadi modal utama dibandingkan hanya sekedar menciptakan orang-orang cerdas, pintar dan memiliki pengetahuan yang luas.Pengetahuan yang luas kalau tidak disertai karakter tidak banyak manfaatnya. Buktinya banyak orang cerdas bergelar di Indonesia namun kurang penghargaan kepada mereka yang memiliki komitmen untuk mengelola Tanah Air dengan tulus. Indonesia masih memberi tempat kepada mereka yang memiliki pengetahuan cerdas dan luas tetapi bermental korup. Semakin banyak orang seperti ini menduduki kursi birokrasi dan profesional di suprastruktur semakin sulit menjadikan Indonesia yang kuat.Dalam sejarah kebangsaan, bangsa berkarakter itulah yang akan memenangkan persaingan tingkat global. Efisiensi dan efektivitas merupakan kunci manajerial tetapi kejujuran, komitmen dan integritas pribadi merupakan modal luar biasa pentingnya.Saatnya menciptakan Indonesia yang kuat dan bersatu dengan mencanangkan pendidikan ahlak, integritas dan kejujuran menjadi pilar dari pembangunan abad ke-21.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • An Analysis of Current Indo-Pacific Dynamics
  • Challenges Faced by Journalism
  • Role of Indonesia in Shaping Indo-Pacific
  • In Seeking Global Supremacy in Technology: A Case of Rivalry The US-China
  • Ninik Rahayu dan Asep Setiawan Lengkapi Kepengurusan Dewan Pers 2022-2025

Archives

Categories

My Tweets

Pages

  • About
  • Bahasa Inggris Diplomasi
  • Karya Jurnalistik
  • My Books
  • Pengantar Hubungan Internasional
  • Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

  • Follow Following
    • Jurnal Asep Setiawan
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Jurnal Asep Setiawan
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: